DISINFO: Moldovan doctors await Sputnik V, refusing to get vaccinated with AstraZeneca

DISINFORMATION CASE DETAILS

DISINFO: Moldovan doctors await Sputnik V, refusing to get vaccinated with AstraZeneca

SUMMARY

Moldovan doctors are waiting for Sputnik V, refusing the Romanian AstraZeneca. Specialists in the field do not trust the Romanian AstraZeneca and are waiting for the Russian Sputnik V to arrive in the republic.

RESPONSE

Recurring disinformation narrative about vaccination, presenting the vaccines approved by WHO as not so efficient as Russian Sputnik V. See here a similar case claiming that Moldovan doctors refuse to be vaccinated, in general, against COVID-19.

The claim comes as two groups of doctors from the Gagauz autonomy of the Republic of Moldova asked the Ministry of Health not to send them AstraZeneca vaccines, donated by Romania, as there are no people willing to be vaccinated. The text quotes the head of the hospital in Ceadir-Lunga with the statement: “Our team agrees to be vaccinated. But they want either Pfizer or Sputnik V.”

Respectively, the statement that Moldovan doctors are waiting for the Sputnik V vaccine is disinforming.

According to data from the Ministry of Health, from the first day of the vaccination campaign, March 2, 2021, and until March 5, 2021, 3 849 medical workers were vaccinated. In the Republic of Moldova, only the AstraZeneca vaccine is used so far, as the country's authorities have so far been able to acquire only this vaccine - 21,600 doses of vaccine were donated to Moldova by Romania, and another 14,400 doses were delivered to Moldova through the COVAX programme.

The Ministry of Health announced that it allows the use on the territory of the Republic of Moldova of other vaccines authorised in the countries of origin and on the WHO evaluation list. Among them is also the Sputnik V, but so far this vaccine has not been imported in the Republic of Moldova.

Disclaimer

Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

    %s

      Your opinion matters!

      Data Protection Information *

        Subscribe to the Disinfo Review

        Your weekly update on pro-Kremlin disinformation

        Data Protection Information *

        The Disinformation Review is sent through Mailchimp.com. See Mailchimp’s privacy policy and find out more on how EEAS protects your personal data.

        🎵 Playlist