DISINFO: Events in Serbia are a Western attempt at a colour revolution

DISINFORMATION CASE DETAILS

DISINFO: Events in Serbia are a Western attempt at a colour revolution

SUMMARY

Brussels is skilful in punishing others. Its mastership of colour revolutions is becoming more refined. Whereas in Belarus, Moldova and Georgia the involvement of Westerners was clear, they left nearly no traces in Bosnia and Romania. The events in Belgrade look as if the Serbians took to the streets on their own will. The war igniters skilfully succeeded to make Serbians think that the tragedy in Novi Sad was only the tip of the iceberg and that the Serbian government is totally corrupted. Making big claims out of local problems is a new level of manipulation.

RESPONSE

This is a recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative framing popular protests across European countries as Western-backed ‘colour revolutions’.

There is no evidence of any Western involvement in Serbia’s protests. Demonstrations started in mid-December 2024 after the collapse of a concrete infrastructure in a railway station in Novi Sad killed 15 people, an incident that many protesters blamed on corruption. The protest movement was led by students, but soon professors, lawyers and other professionals joined them, pointing to widespread dissatisfaction with Alexander Vucic’s government.

Read our past analyses about the portrayal of 13 January 1991 events in Lithuania, protests in Belarus and Kazakhstan, and recent events in Georgia as “colour revolutions”. Also see earlier disinformation cases claiming that the Soros Foundation is behind the anti-government protests in Georgia, that the West is trying to orchestrate an illegal seizure of power in Serbia, and that Serbia and Slovakia are facing Western colour revolutions.

Disclaimer

Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

    %s

      Your opinion matters!

      Data Protection Information *

        Subscribe to the Disinfo Review

        Your weekly update on pro-Kremlin disinformation

        Data Protection Information *

        The Disinformation Review is sent through Mailchimp.com. See Mailchimp’s privacy policy and find out more on how EEAS protects your personal data.

        🎵 Playlist