DISINFO: Despite the Western pressure, the Georgian authorities managed not to get involved and not open a second front

DISINFORMATION CASE DETAILS

DISINFO: Despite the Western pressure, the Georgian authorities managed not to get involved and not open a second front

SUMMARY

The results of the elections in Georgia made it possible to avoid a new catastrophe in the South Caucasus. Despite the powerful pressure from Western partners, the Georgian authorities managed to hold out, not get involved in the war and not open a second front.

Tbilisi was under pressure from the first days of the outbreak of hostilities in Ukraine.

It won't be easy now, sanctions are not excluded. However, attempts by some EU partners to put pressure on Georgia's elected government will not be successful.

RESPONSE

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about an allegedly aggressive West playing a destabilising role in the Caucasus, creating turmoil and dragging the region into chaos. The claim also advances a recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about Georgia, accusing the Western countries of dragging the country into the war with Russia.

This claim was made in the context of Georgia's parliamentary elections which took place on Saturday 26 October 2024. Seethe latest statement from J Borrell concerning the elections in Georgia: Statement by the High Representative Josep Borrell on the latest developments following the Parliamentary elections | EEAS.

Since the launch of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, pro-Kremlin and other Russian state-controlled outlets actively deployed disinformation narratives that the US, the EU, or even Ukraine are aiming to change power in Georgia and drag the country into the war with Russia, to open a ‘second front’ against Moscow and to ease the situation for Kyiv on the Ukrainian front.

These claims are groundless. Western countries are not interested in an escalation of the war. Neither the US nor the EU, nor Ukraine are pushing Georgia to open a second front against Moscow.

Pro-Kremlin outlets frequently promote the idea that the Caucasus is exclusively within Russia's zone of geopolitical dominance and attempt to discredit any other cooperation between the Western countries and Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia. This is an attempt to deny these countries their right to decide their own political orientation.

Western countries support peace and security in the South Caucasus region. The EU has a strong interest in a politically stable and economically prosperous Southern Caucasus in full understanding with the states there.

Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, the South Caucasus has been a region of several ethno-political conflicts — Abkhazia, Nagorno–Karabakh, and South Ossetia. To this day, Russia continues to occupy 20 per cent of Georgia’s territory and impose its will on the people there, including by claiming the transfer of strategically important lands in Abkhazia to Russia.

Read also EUvsDisinfo's articles on "Twists and turns: Georgian Dream rhetoric on the EU", “Georgia: Resilience in action” and “Georgia: The next colour revolution?”.

Read similar disinformation cases claiming that The West is trying to sow chaos in Transcaucasia, that West want to start a colour revolution in Georgia and use it against Russia, that The West tried to force Georgia to open a “second front” against Russia, that The West wants to turn Georgia into an anti-Russian springboard, attempts to influence elections to replace current government, that The West seeks to drag Georgia into conflict with Russia, that The US and EU plan to destabilise the situation in Georgia, that The West is aiming to open a second front against Russia, that West seeks to turn the South Caucasus into an arena of geopolitical confrontation, or that The West is trying to destabilise the South Caucasus out of envy and endless malice.

Disclaimer

Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

    %s

      Your opinion matters!

      Data Protection Information *

        Subscribe to the Disinfo Review

        Your weekly update on pro-Kremlin disinformation

        Data Protection Information *

        The Disinformation Review is sent through Mailchimp.com. See Mailchimp’s privacy policy and find out more on how EEAS protects your personal data.

        🎵 Playlist