Kremlin Media Says the Kremlin Does Not Interfere in Kremlin Media

  • Read this article in:
  • en
  • ru
00:00
Kremlin Media Says the Kremlin Does Not Interfere in Kremlin Media
Please rate your listening experience

This Monday, Sputnik stated in a tweet that “Russia doesn’t interfere in TV editorial policy.”

https://twitter.com/SputnikInt/status/1099967061604945925

Before reminding ourselves of the way the Kremlin exercises its media control, let’s have a quick look at who is actually speaking in this tweet.

“Russia Today” does not mean Russia Today

Together with RIA Novosti, Sputnik is a part of the state media giant Rossiya Segodnya, which in translation means “Russia Today.” But that does not mean that Rossiya Segodnya is the same as Russia Today (RT); these are two separate organisations. Nevertheless, the chief editor of Sputnik and of Russia Today happens to be one and the same person; her name is Margarita Simonyan.

To make things even more complicated, the CEO of Rossiya Segodnya is also the host of the show Vesti Nedeli, (“News of the Week”), on the state TV channel Rossiya 1. His name is Dmitriy Kiselyov.

And perhaps you already guessed the TV programme in which the story appeared, which Sputnik is so eager to deny was the result of state control? Of course, on Kiselyov’s News of the Week.

The Russian journalist and chief editor of Coda’s Russian edition, Alexey Kovalyov, was quick to comment on Sputnik’s tweet in this Twitter thread.

The weekly meetings

Sputnik’s tweet is incorrect and an example of pro-Kremlin disinformation.

It is known for a fact that the Kremlin exercises direct control over the dominating Russian media; and more and more details about this system have surfaced over the last few years.

Whistle-blowers have told about the daily work in a government-controlled media organisation; in some cases, even printed versions of the Kremlin’s instructions have surfaced.

A recent investigation carried out by independent Russian journalists has thrown additional light on the weekly meetings with the Kremlin where chief editors receive these instructions.

So when Sputnik presents its denial of state control as “URGENT,” one can’t help thinking of the logic known from psychoanalysis: That if the client asserts something repeatedly and unusually strongly, it is often because the truth is the opposite of what the client is saying.

Further reading:

The Weekly Meetings

How to Get a 146% Election Result

“We Don’t Promote the English Queen’s Anniversary!!!”

Top image: Screenshot from Sputnik’s tweet.

Disclaimer

Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

    %s

      Your opinion matters!

      Data Protection Information *

        Subscribe to the Disinfo Review

        Your weekly update on pro-Kremlin disinformation

        Data Protection Information *

        The Disinformation Review is sent through Mailchimp.com. See Mailchimp’s privacy policy and find out more on how EEAS protects your personal data.

        🎵 Playlist